The Consulate General of Haiti in Miami Reportedly Spent Approximately 50,000 Dollars for a 48-Hour Visit by Dany Laferrière
of pipe dreams in the management of Haitian diplomatic public affairs. Nearly 50,000 US dollars were reportedly drawn from the funds of the Consulate General of Haiti in Miami to organize, late last March, an approximately 48-hour stay for writer Dany Laferrière in this Floridian metropolis.
By La Rédaction · Port-au-Prince
· 2 min read · Updated 24 April 2026
Translated from French — AI-assisted and reviewed by the editorial team. The French version is authoritative. Read the original · About our translation policy

Beware of pipe dreams in the management of Haitian diplomatic public affairs. Nearly 50,000 US dollars were reportedly drawn from the funds of the Consulate General of Haiti in Miami to organize, late last March, an approximately 48-hour stay for writer Dany Laferrière in this Floridian metropolis. This visit, orchestrated by the administration of the then Consul General, Antonio Réginald Victor Louis, was justified in the name of culture, diplomacy, and perhaps, prestige.
Reached by phone, the newly appointed current Consul General, Yverick Delerme Cyril, was unable to confirm or deny this information, which we obtained from reliable sources.
Some will say that this sum is not excessive when it comes to hosting an immortal of the Académie française. Granted. But in a public management context as precarious as that of Haiti, the real question remains: what is the added value? A lasting improvement in the image of the Haitian community in Miami? Increased recognition of Haitian rara on the international cultural scene? A genuine rapprochement between the consulate and its constituents? Or simply the satisfaction of a fantasy?
In Haitian administrative practices, event planning too often tends to supplant the substantial. It allows for occupying media space, flattering egos, and, above all, justifying lavish expenses whose impact remains difficult to measure.
By constantly transforming institutions into event showcases, there is a risk of squandering valuable resources on punctual and spectacular initiatives, to the detriment of structuring and sustainable actions. A subtle way to mask inaction.
And, in this logic, the Anti-Corruption Unit (ULCC) should exercise closer scrutiny to verify whether these types of initiatives genuinely fall within a coherent public policy or rather stem from improvised management, conducive to embezzlement.
_April 30, 2025_
Continue reading



