When the CPT Attempts to Place Itself Above the Law, the Fusion of Social Democrats Political Party Protests
By Newsroom · Port-au-Prince
· 2 min read · Updated 24 April 2026
Translated from French — AI-assisted and reviewed by the editorial team. The French version is authoritative. Read the original · About our translation policy

PORT-AU-PRINCE.— By adopting a decree aimed at exempting some of its members from common law justice after February 7, the Transitional Presidential Council (CPT) crosses a red line with major institutional consequences. Under the guise of formal legality, this text appears not as a reform but as a self-protection maneuver, adopted on the eve of the end of the transitional authorities' mandate.
For the FUSION of Social Democrats political party, the interpretation is unambiguous: it is neither a stability mechanism nor a guarantee of state continuity, but a judicial lock-in designed to prevent any accountability. When the decree ceases to be an instrument serving the Nation to become a shield for outgoing leaders, the very essence of the rule of law is subverted.
At the heart of the criticism is the establishment of an exceptional regime. By protecting a few officials while leaving the population exposed to often expeditious justice, the CPT would enshrine a double standard. This logic directly clashes with the fundamental principle of equality before the law and revives the specter of institutionalized impunity.
In a firm stance, FUSION reiterates several non-negotiable principles:
- no decree can place leaders above the law;
- no function, even transitional, confers a right to impunity;
- the end of a mandate cannot justify a post-hoc judicial lock-in.