A New Spokesperson at the Prime Minister's Office: What Future for Bendgy Tilias at the Secretariat of State for Communication?
By La Rédaction · Port-au-Prince
· 3 min read · Updated 24 April 2026
Translated from French — AI-assisted and reviewed by the editorial team. The French version is authoritative. Read the original · About our translation policy

Government communication in Haiti is taking a new turn. Citizen Ené Val was officially installed this Tuesday as the new spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office, as part of the 'Tuesdays of the Nation' initiative, presented by the Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister, Me Axène Joseph. A decision welcomed by several sector stakeholders for its symbolic and strategic significance, but which also raises important questions: what becomes of the role of Bendgy Tilias, the current Secretary of State for Communication?
A strong voice to structure government discourse
The appointment of Ené Val, presented as a respected figure in the intellectual and media world, is part of a clear desire to refocus government communication. A lawyer, political scientist, philosopher, and experienced analyst, Val was introduced as a 'clear, legitimate, and rigorously competent' voice, capable of strengthening the clarity of public action in a context of persistent crisis and the search for citizen trust.
This positioning gives the new spokesperson a stature and visibility that could easily exceed the technical scope of a simple liaison role. Indeed, the tone of the official statement, as well as the scale of the presentation ceremony, suggest a desire to give this function real political weight.
Redundancy or complementarity?
It is precisely this rise in prominence of the position of spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office that calls into question the scope of action of the Secretariat of State for Communication. Since his appointment, Bendgy Tilias has been striving to reposition the communication of the Haitian state on more modern and inclusive foundations. However, the arrival of a new spokesperson — with such a comprehensive and media-savvy profile — could create an overlap of responsibilities, or even a dilution of competencies.
Is this institutional redundancy, or an attempt at strategic rebalancing? The question deserves to be asked. While Tilias embodies a global institutional communication, often oriented towards ministries and the state apparatus in the broader sense, the designation of a single spokesperson for the Prime Minister's Office can be interpreted as a refocusing of communication efforts around the figure of the Prime Minister.
A possible cohabitation?
For now, no official communication specifies the functional relationship between the two figures. But Bendgy Tilias's future within the government team will likely depend on his ability to redefine his scope of intervention, to reposition himself in the face of a communication authority now centralized at the Prime Minister's Office, and to assert the complementarity of his role.
In politics, the duplication of functions is never insignificant. It often signals internal adjustments, or even future reshuffles. Tilias, who still enjoys a certain amount of goodwill, will have to show tact and initiative to avoid being relegated to the background.



